Best Impexium Alternatives in 2026 (Now re:Members AMS)

Last Updated: August 2026

If you went looking for Impexium and landed on a site called re:Members, nothing has gone wrong. On 27 January 2025 the vendor retired four separate product brands and folded them under one name. Billhighway became re:Members Financials, ChapterSpot became re:Members CRM, and Impexium became re:Members AMS. The platform did not shut down and your data did not go anywhere. The name on the invoice changed.

The ownership behind that change is worth knowing. Impexium was acquired by Billhighway in November 2020, and Billhighway is backed by the private equity firm Lovell Minnick Partners. The product is still under active development: the vendor shipped Data Share and the re:Members Agent in 2026, though an independent analyst describes both as early access and cautions that proof matters more than demos.

Plenty of people searching for Impexium alternatives in 2026 are doing it for the ordinary reasons instead: the vendor publishes no pricing, the realistic first-year cost runs into five figures, and implementation takes three to nine months. This roundup ranks nine platforms by ownership, real cost, and who each one fits. Raklet is one of them and appears first because this is our page. If you want the direct head to head instead of a field guide, read how Raklet compares to Impexium, or browse every one of our alternatives to Impexium and its peers.

Why Organizations Look for Impexium Alternatives

Four reasons come up consistently across review platforms and independent analyst coverage.

1. You cannot find out what it costs. re:Members publishes no pricing page. The vendor instead asks prospects to share their “project and annual budget range” during the proposal conversation, which reverses the normal direction of a price quote. The only public number is the $175 per month figure on its Capterra listing, and an independent AMS analyst review describes that figure as insufficient for a real deployment, putting realistic first year spend at $43,000 to $188,000 including implementation.

2. It is built for a larger organization than yours. The same analyst puts the target buyer at an operating budget of $3.5 million or more, with implementation running three to nine months. Below that line you are buying chapter, certification, and awards machinery you may never switch on, and the reviewer names this overbuy risk directly.

3. Updates have broken customer configurations. The most serious complaint on record comes from a reviewer on Software Advice who reported that custom reports were “corrupted as soon as they push thru any updates,” alongside duplicate records created after updates that could not be deleted. For a system of record holding your membership data, that is the failure mode that matters most.

4. The system sets your process. One reviewer put it plainly: “We moved to this system and had to change our processes to fit the system.” The smaller frustrations they document follow the same shape. Events cannot be archived, which reviewers call “cumbersome and time consuming,” invoices have to be exported to PDF rather than emailed from the system, and the member directory is described as “very bland and not easy to look at or use.”

Two things deserve saying plainly, because most comparison pages will not say them. First, re:Members AMS is not a badly reviewed product. It holds 3.5 out of 5 on Capterra and three of those four reviews are positive, with customer service rated 4.3 out of 5 and one reviewer volunteering that the vendor does not “nickel and dime, like most other AMS companies.” Second, and more usefully: there are only four reviews. Info-Tech’s SoftwareReviews carries none at all, the most detailed critical review dates from September 2019 (before both the acquisition and the rebrand), and the review history is now split across two different product names. For a platform you will sign a multi year contract with, that thin an evidence base is itself a procurement risk worth weighing.

What to Look for in an Impexium Alternative

Five criteria, each one answering a pain above.

• Pricing you can check without a sales call. If you cannot estimate three year cost from public information, you cannot build a budget case before committing to a demo cycle.
• Time to first value. Ask whether you can run an actual renewal cycle this quarter. A three to nine month implementation is a different kind of project from a platform you configure yourself in an afternoon.
• Who owns the vendor. Ask who the parent company is, who the financial backer is, and how many times the product has been renamed or resold. This is the single question buyers skip most often and regret most.
• Upgrade safety. Ask directly whether vendor updates have ever broken customer reports or created duplicate records, and what the rollback path is. Ask for a reference customer who has been through a major version upgrade.
• Feature depth matched to what you actually run. Chapters, certifications, and awards tracking are decisive if you have them and dead weight if you do not.

The Best Impexium Alternatives

1. Raklet

Founded 2013 · Privately held · 10+ employees

Raklet is an all in one membership platform covering CRM, memberships, events, payments, email, and a member community. It is built around an app store model, so you switch on the pieces you need rather than buying a full AMS suite and growing into it. Pricing is published in full, metered on total contacts and the features each tier unlocks, and every plan includes free native iOS and Android apps for members.

Pricing: Free forever at 100 contacts with no credit card. Essentials $49 per month, Professional $99 per month, Premium $399 per month, all on annual billing. Additional contact packs of 1,000 cost $29 per month, so you expand capacity without being forced into the next tier. A custom branded app published under your own name in the App Store and Google Play is a $299 per month add on billed annually. API access, SSO, and custom domains arrive on Premium. See the current Raklet pricing plans for transaction fee rates, which vary by plan and apply on top of your payment processor’s fees.

Best for: Small and mid sized associations, chapters, and nonprofits that want to be running this month and want to know the price before they talk to anyone.

Not ideal for: Organizations that need a drag and drop website builder (Raklet’s page builder is code based), a standalone conference app, or the certification and accreditation depth a large professional society requires.

2. iMIS

Privately held by Advanced Solutions International · 200 to 250 employees

iMIS is the incumbent enterprise AMS for large associations and professional societies, and one of the few significant platforms in this category still independently held rather than sitting in a PE portfolio. It is an engagement management system as much as a database, with deep functionality for complex membership structures, certification, and fundraising. It expects an implementation partner and internal ownership.

Pricing: Not published. Professional starts around $7,200 per year with a two to three user minimum, plus roughly $200 per additional user per year, and a one time installation fee of $15,000 to $20,000. A ten user small organization lands near $41,600 in year one before implementation partner fees, migration, or module add ons. Modules such as LMS, mobile, and awards are licensed separately.

Best for: Large associations that need enterprise depth and specifically want an owner that has not changed hands.

Not ideal for: Anyone under a few hundred members, or any team without an internal system owner.

3. MemberClicks

PE owned by Momentive Software (TA Associates) · 51 to 200 employees

MemberClicks is a mature mid market AMS with strong traction among trade associations and chambers of commerce. It ships as two distinct product lines, MC Trade for organizations whose members are companies and MC Professional for individual member associations, and picking the wrong one is an expensive mistake to unwind. Since January 2026 it sits in the same Momentive portfolio as YourMembership and Wild Apricot. If you are weighing it seriously, our Best MemberClicks Alternatives roundup asks the same ownership questions of its own field.

Pricing: MC Trade starts at about $3,500 per year and MC Professional at about $4,500 per year. Past the entry tier everything is quote based. The documented MC Professional ladder runs from roughly $3,108 for 300 members or fewer to about $7,188 at 10,000. A price increase of roughly 20 percent landed across the customer base in July 2023 and is still cited in reviews.

Best for: Trade associations and chambers wanting a proven mid market AMS with a large customer base.

Not ideal for: Buyers who want price certainty at renewal, or who would rather not be inside a three brand consolidation.

4. GrowthZone

PE backed by Lead Edge Capital · 150 to 170 employees

GrowthZone is purpose built for chambers of commerce and trade associations, with genuinely strong handling of organizational membership, tiered dues, and non dues revenue. Its chamber lineage shows in the workflow design, which is a real advantage if that is your model and noise if it is not.

Pricing: Fully opaque, contact sales only, with no published price grid. Third party review platforms and analysts consistently report a starting point around $3,900 per year, roughly $325 per month. Mid market packages are estimated near $10,000 in first year total including onboarding. The LMS and website design packages bill separately, annual billing is standard, and at least one Capterra reviewer reported an unannounced price increase.

Best for: Chambers of commerce and trade associations where organizational membership and tiered dues drive the decision.

Not ideal for: Individual member professional societies, or anyone who needs a number before a sales call.

5. Novi AMS

Independently held · 11 to 50 employees

Novi AMS is built around a genuine two way QuickBooks Online sync, which makes it unusually attractive to associations whose finance function is the real constraint. Membership data and accounting stay reconciled without the export and re import cycle most AMS platforms force. It is also one of the few platforms here with no private equity owner, which is worth something if vendor churn is what pushed you to look. Our Best Novi AMS Alternatives page covers the accounting native field in more detail.

Pricing: Published and banded by your annual revenue rather than member count. Core, for organizations up to $400,000 in revenue, is $829 per month plus $3,600 onboarding. Prime, from $400,000 to $1 million, is $1,285 per month plus $4,650 onboarding. Advanced, from $4 million to $6 million, is $2,750 per month plus $13,900 onboarding. A QuickBooks Online subscription is required separately.

Best for: Associations already committed to QuickBooks Online that want membership and accounting genuinely reconciled.

Not ideal for: Anyone not on QuickBooks Online. It is a hard dependency, not a preference.

6. Fonteva

PE owned by Togetherwork (GI Partners) · 51 to 100 employees

Fonteva is built natively on Salesforce, which makes it the closest structural comparison to the Salesforce based re:Members AMS Platform edition. For an association already standardized on Salesforce with admin capacity in house, it inherits the whole Salesforce ecosystem. For everyone else it inherits Salesforce’s cost structure too.

Pricing: Not disclosed. Third party sources cite the membership module from around $175 per month and the events module from $8,400 per year, priced per user per year. The critical detail is that Salesforce platform licenses at $25 to $150 per user per month are required separately and are not included in a Fonteva quote. Implementation typically adds $50,000 to $100,000 for a mid sized organization, putting realistic year one all in at $75,000 to $150,000 or more.

Best for: Associations already running Salesforce with the admin capacity to support it.

Not ideal for: Anyone not already on Salesforce. The platform licensing alone changes the maths.

7. YourMembership

PE owned by Momentive Software (TA Associates) · 1,000+ employees

YourMembership is a long established AMS aimed at small and mid sized associations wanting a single vendor suite, with a bundled LMS that most alternatives here do not match natively. It has changed corporate hands three times in nine years and now sits alongside MemberClicks and Wild Apricot under Momentive Software.

Pricing: No public pricing, quotes only after a demo. Estimated base is around $3,990 per year, with the full range running $3,000 to $20,000 depending on size and modules. Implementation adds $2,000 to $5,000, data migration $500 to $3,000, and training $300 to $1,000. Three year total cost of ownership is estimated at $14,000 to $20,000, and renewal increases are documented in reviews.

Best for: Small to mid sized associations that want a bundled LMS inside one vendor relationship.

Not ideal for: Buyers for whom ownership stability or renewal price certainty is the deciding factor.

8. Wild Apricot

PE owned by Momentive Software (TA Associates) · 51 to 200 employees

Wild Apricot is the most widely used small association platform in North America and the usual landing spot for organizations stepping down from an enterprise AMS. Every plan carries the same feature set and only contact capacity changes, which makes pricing refreshingly easy to model. It also includes the template based website builder that Raklet does not have.

Pricing: Published and contact based, on annual billing: Free at 50 contacts, Personal about $54 per month at 100, Community about $108 at 500, Professional about $198 at 2,000, Network about $342 at 5,000, Enterprise about $441 at 15,000. One real gotcha: US and Canadian accounts that use Stripe, PayPal, or Authorize.net rather than Personify Payments are charged an additional 20 percent surcharge on their subscription.

Best for: Small associations under about 1,000 contacts that need a website and membership database together.

Not ideal for: Organizations that will outgrow the contact tiers quickly, or that want to keep their existing payment processor without the surcharge.

9. Glue Up

Independently held, VC backed (Eminence Ventures, GSR Ventures) · 150 to 200 employees

Glue Up is an events led membership platform with unusually strong event, community, and engagement tooling, and a substantial presence across Asia Pacific and the Middle East that most competitors here lack. It began publishing public pricing in 2026, which puts it in a small minority of this field.

Pricing: Professional runs $3,000 to $6,500 per year, Advanced $8,000 to $18,500, and Enterprise is custom. Contracts bill annually by default and event allowances scale by tier, at 25 events per year on Professional, 75 on Advanced, and 300 on Enterprise. Sold demo to buy with no self serve checkout, and no free plan or trial.

Best for: Associations running heavy event and conference programmes, especially with an APAC or Middle East footprint.

Not ideal for: Organizations wanting to start small and self serve, or those whose needs are membership administration rather than events.

Impexium Alternatives Compared

Prices as of August 2026 based on published pricing pages. Quote based figures are ranges from verified customer reports and third party analyst estimates.

Read down the Ownership column and the shape of this category becomes obvious. Three of these products answer to the same parent.

View full screen ↗

What does each platform cost at your member count?

Prices as of August 2026 based on published pricing pages, on annual billing where offered. Quote based figures are ranges from verified customer reports and third party analyst estimates. Implementation and onboarding fees are listed separately where the vendor charges them.

Only three platforms here publish pricing that actually scales with your contact or member count. The rest quote per deal, which is itself a useful signal.

View full screen ↗

Which Impexium Alternative Is Right for You?

Sort by your situation rather than by feature count. If you are under about 1,000 members and the real problem is that you cannot get a straight price or start this quarter, Raklet and Wild Apricot are the two platforms here that let you see the cost and begin without a sales cycle. Raklet gives you more room to grow before the price moves, thanks to add on contact packs instead of forced tier jumps. Wild Apricot gives you a template based website builder that Raklet does not have.

If you genuinely need enterprise depth, certification tracking, and complex chapter governance, iMIS is the serious comparison, and it has the advantage of an owner that has stayed put. If your finance team drives the decision and you run QuickBooks Online, Novi AMS is in a category of one. If you are already standardized on Salesforce, Fonteva is the natural fit, provided you go in knowing the platform licences are billed separately. If events are the centre of your programme, Glue Up is built for that and publishes its prices.

If ownership churn is what pushed you to look in the first place, be deliberate about it. Moving from re:Members AMS to MemberClicks, YourMembership, or Wild Apricot means moving from one private equity portfolio to another, and in those three cases to the same one. Raklet, Novi AMS, and iMIS are the independently held options on this list. For most small and mid sized associations frustrated by opaque pricing and long implementations, Raklet is worth evaluating first: you can start free with 100 contacts and find out this week whether it fits.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Impexium alternative?
It depends on your size. For small and mid sized associations, Raklet is the strongest overall option because it publishes its pricing, offers a permanent free tier, and can be running in days rather than months. For large associations needing deep enterprise functionality, iMIS is the closest like for like replacement. For chambers of commerce specifically, GrowthZone is purpose built for that model.

What happened to Impexium?
Impexium was renamed re:Members AMS on 27 January 2025. Its parent company consolidated four product brands under the single re:Members name at the same time, with Billhighway becoming re:Members Financials and ChapterSpot becoming re:Members CRM. The product continues to operate and impexium.com now redirects to remembers.com. Impexium was acquired by Billhighway in November 2020.

What is the cheapest Impexium alternative?
Raklet is the cheapest credible option, starting free at 100 contacts and rising to $49 per month on annual billing for 500 contacts. Wild Apricot is next, with a free tier at 50 contacts and paid plans from about $54 per month. Every other platform in this roundup starts in the thousands of dollars per year, and most require a sales call before quoting.

Is there a free Impexium alternative?
Yes. Raklet has a permanent free plan covering 100 contacts with no credit card required, including CRM, memberships, events, and community features. Wild Apricot offers a free tier limited to 50 contacts. Neither is a time limited trial. re:Members AMS itself has no free version and no free trial according to its own Capterra listing.

How long does it take to migrate off Impexium?
Plan for three to nine months if you are moving to another enterprise AMS, which is the implementation benchmark independent analysts report for platforms of this class. Timelines depend on data complexity, how much customization you carry, and your team’s availability. Moving to a self serve platform such as Raklet or Wild Apricot is considerably faster, often weeks, because there is no vendor led implementation phase.

How much does re:Members AMS cost?
The vendor does not publish pricing and asks prospects for their budget range instead. Its Capterra listing shows $175 per month, but an independent AMS analyst describes that as insufficient for a real deployment and estimates realistic first year cost at $43,000 to $188,000 including implementation. That estimate targets associations with operating budgets of $3.5 million or more.

The Bottom Line on Impexium Alternatives

If you came here because the name changed, the answer is simple: Impexium is re:Members AMS, and the product is still running. If you came because you cannot get a price, the implementation is longer than your timeline, or you would rather not be inside a private equity rollup, the alternatives are real. Raklet fits small and mid sized associations that want published pricing and a same week start, iMIS fits large societies that need enterprise depth from an owner that has stayed independent, and Novi AMS fits any association whose accounting drives the decision. If re:Members is not the only platform you are reconsidering, the roundups below cover the closest peer comparisons.

Compare to Other Association Management Alternatives

Still narrowing down your shortlist? Several of the platforms ranked above have their own dedicated alternatives roundup. Compare them side by side to see how the rest of the association management landscape stacks up.